From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 11:48:05 -0700 Message-ID: <200604231848.k3NIm59Y015701@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <200604212310.k3LNA3Jp018780@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <200604230159.k3N1xpBu021881@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <200604231623.k3NGNhe0012814@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145818208 29849 80.91.229.2 (23 Apr 2006 18:50:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 23 20:50:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjem-0004Zv-Qs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:50:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjem-0006py-Bj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjdl-0005YI-ML for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjdk-0005Wz-Rb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjdk-0005Wf-HI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:49:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [128.195.1.36] (helo=scanner2.ics.uci.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FXjfm-00086L-DZ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:51:06 -0400 Original-Received: from vino.ics.uci.edu (vino.ics.uci.edu [128.195.11.198]) by scanner2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3NIm59Y015701; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 11:48:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:40:16 +0300") Original-Lines: 17 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-0.84, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, J_CHICKENPOX_62 0.60) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@vino.ics.uci.edu X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53273 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Cc: Luc Teirlinck , romain@orebokech.com, > > Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > From: Dan Nicolaescu > > Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:23:43 -0700 > > > > Given that the above additions to loadup.el have added some desirable > > functionality to the default emacs build, the increase in pure memory > > use should be acceptable. > > I didn't say the additions were useless, just that the added footprint > wasn't negligible. I had no intention of implying that. Just that the additional space is well explained by the added functionality, so there's little reason to worry that is due to hidden bug/problem.