From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:05:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <200604230105.k3N15Hia021791@jane.dms.auburn.edu> References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <200604212310.k3LNA3Jp018780@jane.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145754382 340 80.91.229.2 (23 Apr 2006 01:06:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 23 03:06:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXT3H-0000Ck-2p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 03:06:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXT3G-0000AE-It for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXT35-0000A1-Su for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXT34-00009a-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXT33-00009T-Q2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:06:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FXT4s-0003m7-Qc; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:07:55 -0400 Original-Received: from jane.dms.auburn.edu (jane.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.201]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3N15sQY028970; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:05:54 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jane.dms.auburn.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jane.dms.auburn.edu (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k3N15HMU021794; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:05:17 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by jane.dms.auburn.edu (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.3/Submit) id k3N15Hia021791; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:05:17 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: jane.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:33:00 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53247 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: If the numbers vary a little, that's not important in itself. But if they are very different, that suggests something else is wrong. They are not very different. They only differ by a fraction of one percent. Running temacs under GDB and putting a breakpoint on Fload (as Eli suggested) just does not seem to work for me. After byte-run is loaded, pure_bytes_used is 76028 for me, which is less than the 79800 posted by Eli at the same point in temacs. After that `c' in GDB just continues, apparently completely ignoring the breakpoint on Fload. After bootstrapping, my pure-bytes-used is 1200904, which is apparently less than the 1216528 reported by Eli. Both numbers are larger than BASE_PURESIZE used to be before it got increased from 1200000 to 1205000. After that increase I no longer get the overflow warning. I have a few tiny uninstalled changes, but if these make a difference, the fudge factor would really be to small. Sincerely, Luc.