From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem report #8 Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:09:26 -0700 Message-ID: <200604100109.k3A19Qkc002516@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> References: <200604090659.k396xI5h005539@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <87lkuesl99.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200604091832.k39IWcY5020726@amrm2.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144631442 11004 80.91.229.2 (10 Apr 2006 01:10:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 10 03:10:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSkvM-0003d3-Mn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 03:10:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSkvL-00009S-I5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:10:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSkvA-00009D-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSkv9-00008l-BB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSkv9-00008i-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:10:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [128.195.1.36] (helo=scanner2.ics.uci.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FSkze-0001bY-CX; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from vino.ics.uci.edu (vino.ics.uci.edu [128.195.11.198]) by scanner2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3A19Qkc002516; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 18:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:21 -0400") Original-Lines: 21 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@vino.ics.uci.edu X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52577 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > > There are 76 problems, I analyzed 10 of them, none of them were bugs > > > in emacs. > > > Just to be clear: are the bug reports you posted to this list the ones > > that you found to be not bugs, or the ones that you have not analyzed? > > The are the ones that I did not analyze. > > It sounds like there are 66 you did not analyze. Correct. > I suggested you post just SOME of the ones not analyzed, > and it looks like that's what you did. So there would be > many others not yet analyzed which you have not posted. > > Could you please confirm that? Right.