From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem report #8 Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 11:32:38 -0700 Message-ID: <200604091832.k39IWcY5020726@amrm2.ics.uci.edu> References: <200604090659.k396xI5h005539@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <87lkuesl99.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144607585 14081 80.91.229.2 (9 Apr 2006 18:33:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 18:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 09 20:33:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSeiU-0003Ib-6X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:32:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSeiT-0007mi-Mo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:32:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSeiJ-0007mQ-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSeiH-0007m7-4l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:32:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSeiG-0007m4-VZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:32:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [128.195.11.178] (helo=amrm2.ics.uci.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FSemj-0005wC-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:37:18 -0400 Original-Received: from amrm2.ics.uci.edu (amrm2.ics.uci.edu [127.0.0.1]) by amrm2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k39IWcri020727; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 11:32:38 -0700 Original-Received: (from dann@localhost) by amrm2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k39IWcY5020726; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 11:32:38 -0700 Original-To: Chong Yidong In-Reply-To: <87lkuesl99.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:37:38 -0400") Original-Lines: 13 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52564 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > > > I signed up to see the Coverity problem reports. > > RMS asked me to post a few here. > > There are 76 problems, I analyzed 10 of them, none of them were bugs > > in emacs. > > Just to be clear: are the bug reports you posted to this list the ones > that you found to be not bugs, or the ones that you have not analyzed? The are the ones that I did not analyze.