From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Masatake YAMATO Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:40:09 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20060322.044009.07761515.jet@gyve.org> References: <17439.13250.269939.241145@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142970060 1198 80.91.229.2 (21 Mar 2006 19:41:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 21 20:40:57 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLmin-0005QZ-T4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:40:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLmiu-0002rl-Kw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:40:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FLmij-0002rf-8Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:40:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FLmih-0002rT-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:40:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLmih-0002rQ-5q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:40:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [210.130.0.20] (helo=mo01.iij4u.or.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FLmih-0003DC-Sf; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:40:44 -0500 Original-Received: MO(mo01)id k2LJeARA013043; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:40:10 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from localhost (h219-110-075-062.catv01.itscom.jp [219.110.75.62]) by r-kk.iij4u.or.jp (4U-MR/r-kk) id k2LJe9cW010081; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:40:10 +0900 (JST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 22.0.51 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51940 Archived-At: > I guess it would be easier to do if we had a "post-switch-buffer-hook" that > is called (after post-command-hook) whenever a new buffer is selected > in the command loop. > > I really don't like the idea that Emacs could run hooks when switching > buffers. It would make things rather uncontrollable. Why it would do? I think `post-switch-buffer-hook' may be quite useful. e.g. we can give different colors for different buffers. Masatake YAMATO