unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ttn@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 13:14:48 -0600 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603051914.k25JEmo13764@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603051836.k25IaHD13368@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Sun, 5 Mar 2006 12:36:17 -0600 (CST))

>From my previous reply:

   As Andreas already pointed out, there is _no_ way to determine whether
   either a `]' _or_ a `\\]' has to be taken literally or closes a
   character alternative without parsing the regexp forward from the start.

Well, _in certain cases_, you might be able to determine it sooner by
parsing backward from the `]'.  If you see a `]' or "\\]" you know it
has to be taken literally.  (Note: the "\\" are irrelevant to the
question again.)  But then you do not know whether that earlier `]' or
"\\]" has to be taken literally, without keeping going.  If you see an
unquoted [, you know that the `]' closes a character alternative, but
you still do not know whether that `[' is opening that character
alternative or has to be taken literally, as in "[asd[fgh]".  If you
encounter another `[' next you know that either that one opens your
character alternative _or_ that the regexp was very poorly written.

But there definitely are many cases where you would have to parse back
all the way to the beginning.

Sincerely,

Luc.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-05 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-25 17:23 Unquoted special characters in regexps martin rudalics
2006-02-25 18:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-25 19:18   ` martin rudalics
2006-02-25 19:31     ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-25 20:18       ` martin rudalics
2006-02-25 22:09         ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-26 11:32           ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 11:50             ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-26 13:28               ` martin rudalics
2006-02-25 22:13         ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 13:13           ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 13:50             ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-26 16:41               ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 17:53                 ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 18:22                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 19:26                     ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 17:10               ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 17:42                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 19:06                   ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 17:56                 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-26 19:08                   ` martin rudalics
2006-02-27 19:03                     ` Richard Stallman
2006-02-27 19:36                       ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-27 20:03                         ` martin rudalics
2006-02-27 20:32                           ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-27 21:43                             ` martin rudalics
2006-02-27 22:11                               ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-28  6:19                                 ` Richard Stallman
2006-02-28 10:28                                 ` martin rudalics
2006-02-28  0:30                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-28 10:27                         ` martin rudalics
2006-02-28 22:57                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-01 13:00                             ` martin rudalics
2006-03-01 17:54                         ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-02  4:06                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-02 19:43                             ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-02  4:54                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-02 18:40                           ` martin rudalics
2006-03-02 23:26                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-03  7:42                               ` martin rudalics
2006-03-03 13:51                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-03 14:09                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-03 18:52                                   ` martin rudalics
2006-03-03 22:41                                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-03 23:00                                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-03 10:25                             ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-03 15:20                               ` martin rudalics
2006-03-04 13:37                                 ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-04 14:40                                   ` martin rudalics
2006-03-06  0:48                                     ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-03 10:25                             ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-03 15:51                               ` martin rudalics
2006-03-03 23:48                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-04  9:58                                   ` martin rudalics
2006-03-04 23:16                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-05  2:54                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-06  0:49                                 ` Richard Stallman
2006-02-28  0:44                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-04 21:07                         ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2006-03-05  3:37                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-05 11:10                             ` martin rudalics
2006-03-05 15:32                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-06  7:41                                 ` martin rudalics
2006-03-05 17:04                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-05 11:54                             ` martin rudalics
2006-03-05 15:35                               ` Andreas Schwab
2006-03-06  8:19                                 ` martin rudalics
2006-03-05 18:36                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-05 19:14                                 ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2006-03-06  8:17                                   ` martin rudalics
2006-02-28  0:59                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-06 12:52                         ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-07  5:52                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-07  8:53                             ` martin rudalics
2006-02-25 22:34         ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-25 22:59           ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-26 13:20           ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 16:53             ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 18:01               ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 17:19             ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 18:13               ` martin rudalics

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200603051914.k25JEmo13764@raven.dms.auburn.edu \
    --to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
    --cc=ttn@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).