unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: ttn@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 12:36:17 -0600 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603051836.k25IaHD13368@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440AD166.5040108@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sun, 05 Mar 2006 12:54:14 +0100)

Martin Rudalics wrote:

   If my purpose is to understand how a regexp engine interprets a regexp,
   reading a regexp forwardly is superior.

As Andreas already pointed out, there is _no_ way to determine whether
either a `]' _or_ a `\\]' has to be taken literally or closes a
character alternative without parsing the regexp forward from the start.

   In general, languages hiding implementation details are
   easier to use than languages that require users to know how specific
   features are implemented.

But if you _are_ using a language that requires parsing forward from the
beginning for correct understanding, like regexps, then _pretending_
that you are using some other type of language is not going to help.

Sincerely,

Luc.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-05 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-25 17:23 Unquoted special characters in regexps martin rudalics
2006-02-25 18:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-25 19:18   ` martin rudalics
2006-02-25 19:31     ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-25 20:18       ` martin rudalics
2006-02-25 22:09         ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-26 11:32           ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 11:50             ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-26 13:28               ` martin rudalics
2006-02-25 22:13         ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 13:13           ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 13:50             ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-26 16:41               ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 17:53                 ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 18:22                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 19:26                     ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 17:10               ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 17:42                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 19:06                   ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 17:56                 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-26 19:08                   ` martin rudalics
2006-02-27 19:03                     ` Richard Stallman
2006-02-27 19:36                       ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-27 20:03                         ` martin rudalics
2006-02-27 20:32                           ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-27 21:43                             ` martin rudalics
2006-02-27 22:11                               ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-28  6:19                                 ` Richard Stallman
2006-02-28 10:28                                 ` martin rudalics
2006-02-28  0:30                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-28 10:27                         ` martin rudalics
2006-02-28 22:57                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-01 13:00                             ` martin rudalics
2006-03-01 17:54                         ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-02  4:06                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-02 19:43                             ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-02  4:54                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-02 18:40                           ` martin rudalics
2006-03-02 23:26                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-03  7:42                               ` martin rudalics
2006-03-03 13:51                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-03 14:09                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-03 18:52                                   ` martin rudalics
2006-03-03 22:41                                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-03 23:00                                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-03 10:25                             ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-03 15:20                               ` martin rudalics
2006-03-04 13:37                                 ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-04 14:40                                   ` martin rudalics
2006-03-06  0:48                                     ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-03 10:25                             ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-03 15:51                               ` martin rudalics
2006-03-03 23:48                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-04  9:58                                   ` martin rudalics
2006-03-04 23:16                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-05  2:54                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-06  0:49                                 ` Richard Stallman
2006-02-28  0:44                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-04 21:07                         ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2006-03-05  3:37                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-05 11:10                             ` martin rudalics
2006-03-05 15:32                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-06  7:41                                 ` martin rudalics
2006-03-05 17:04                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-05 11:54                             ` martin rudalics
2006-03-05 15:35                               ` Andreas Schwab
2006-03-06  8:19                                 ` martin rudalics
2006-03-05 18:36                               ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2006-03-05 19:14                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-06  8:17                                   ` martin rudalics
2006-02-28  0:59                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-06 12:52                         ` Richard Stallman
2006-03-07  5:52                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-03-07  8:53                             ` martin rudalics
2006-02-25 22:34         ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-25 22:59           ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-26 13:20           ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 16:53             ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 18:01               ` martin rudalics
2006-02-26 17:19             ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-26 18:13               ` martin rudalics

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200603051836.k25IaHD13368@raven.dms.auburn.edu \
    --to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=ttn@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).