From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: c-mode eats resources? Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:17:19 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200602182317.k1INHJC06795@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200602182307.38095.pogonyshev@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140305226 16658 80.91.229.2 (18 Feb 2006 23:27:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 19 00:27:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAbTj-0003Cw-Mg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:27:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAbTi-0001UB-PM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FAbOU-0008BA-TT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:21:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FAbOT-0008AW-8S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:21:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAbOT-0008AR-2D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:21:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FAbU9-0007M9-4P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:27:29 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1INLYBE004979; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:21:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id k1INHJC06795; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:17:19 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: pogonyshev@gmx.net In-reply-to: <200602182307.38095.pogonyshev@gmx.net> (message from Paul Pogonyshev on Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:07:38 +0200) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.1 (manatee.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.104]); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:21:34 -0600 (CST) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50729 Archived-At: Paul Pogonyshev wrote: Apparently, C mode constantly uses processor time even nothing is done in the buffer. E.g. if I open a C file in Emacs and go to a different desktop and start `top' there, it shows Emacs in the first few lines with 3--7% usage of CPU. This cannot be right. Can anybody reproduce this? Can _you_ reproduce it using `emacs -q'? Sincerely, Luc.