From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: better "pr" with gdb-6.4 Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:04:57 -0800 Message-ID: <200602070004.k1704vJF000960@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> References: <200602051840.k15IeONe013609@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139271303 26364 80.91.229.2 (7 Feb 2006 00:15:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 00:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 01:14:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6GVT-0005ER-M9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 01:14:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6GYo-00066C-CF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:18:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F6GTi-00048c-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F6GTe-00047M-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:13:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6GTd-000474-I9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:13:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [128.195.1.36] (helo=scanner2.ics.uci.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F6GTG-0005K2-At for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:12:38 -0500 Original-Received: from vino.ics.uci.edu (vino.ics.uci.edu [128.195.11.198]) by scanner2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1704vJF000960; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:04:57 -0800 (PST) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:01:10 +0100") Original-Lines: 20 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@vino.ics.uci.edu X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50121 Archived-At: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > > > Using "pr" when debugging is a bit inconvenient because one has to do: > > > > p VARIABLE > > pr > > pp C-VARIABLE > pv LISP-VARIABLE Well the same logic applies to these too, you cannot do: p C-VAR pp or pp C-VAR1 C-VAR2