From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giorgos Keramidas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: toggle-viper-mode strangeness Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:45:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20060120124529.GA1200@flame.pc> References: <20060119011332.GA75423@flame.pc> <20060120023521.GA57669@flame.pc> <200601200414.k0K4EbI27165@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <20060119011332.GA75423@flame.pc> <20060120023521.GA57669@flame.pc> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137777678 19242 80.91.229.2 (20 Jan 2006 17:21:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Richard M. Stallman" , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 20 18:21:15 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzzwD-0002wa-4i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:20:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ezzwa-0000Wr-TL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:21:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ezwhz-00023c-3e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:53:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EzvxD-0000AL-4L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:07:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ezvgp-0007TU-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:48:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.170.0.95] (helo=kane.otenet.gr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ezvkz-0007hv-5N; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:52:45 -0500 Original-Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0KCjbCf023252; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:45:38 +0200 Original-Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9EDF4118D6; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:45:29 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Stefan Monnier , Luc Teirlinck Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601200414.k0K4EbI27165@raven.dms.auburn.edu> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49324 Archived-At: On 2006-01-19 23:03, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > I was under the impression that an (if cond then else) expression can > > only have 4 parts within the parentheses. This means that the above > > You're confusing Scheme and Lisp. On 2006-01-19 22:14, Luc Teirlinck wrote: > Or Common Lisp (in which the `else' is _not_ an implicit progn) and Elisp. Common Lisp, in fact. Too much ``M-x slime'' these last few days. Thanks for the clarification everyone. I'll make sure to check with the info docs before I create more noise :)