From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Agustin Martin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: flyspell.el [1.90->1.91] flyspell-large-region-beg should be moved after good match Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:28:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20051219012817.GA26385@agmartin.aq.upm.es> References: <20051216124235.GA3357@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <20051219004115.GA24197@agmartin.aq.upm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134956336 4600 80.91.229.2 (19 Dec 2005 01:38:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:38:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 19 02:38:55 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo9xf-0007de-Di for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:37:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo9uM-0004ZZ-6Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:33:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo9sm-0004JB-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo9q8-0003xt-Iq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:29:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo9pF-0003jY-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:28:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [138.100.4.49] (helo=edison.ccupm.upm.es) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eo9s7-0000Tv-0s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:31:27 -0500 Original-Received: from debian ([138.100.247.74]) by edison.ccupm.upm.es (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBJ1RZQ2014685; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:27:35 +0100 Original-Received: by debian (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4875317DEF; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:28:17 +0100 (CET) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051219004115.GA24197@agmartin.aq.upm.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48022 Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:41:15AM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:03:25PM -0500, Richard M. Stallman wrote: > > I think this fix is a cleaner one. Does it work right? > I will try testing this in a current emacs when I can. I still do not > understand where and why is the jump produced in that file, but as mentioned > above seems related to words tagged as not found because contain chars not > in casechars or boundary-chars, but actually found in the search loop thus > moving point. Tested a bit more, and indeed related to boundary chars mismatch. I am considering a better approach for this kind of mismatches, but is still untested. For it I think we can do better starting from your last committed changes (1.91), so please do *not* apply my patch. I will send a new one once I have tested things better. -- Agustin