From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Pogonyshev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Longlines and insert Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:28:41 +0200 Message-ID: <200511181728.41802.pogonyshev@gmx.net> References: <874q6fa1t0.wl%david.wallin@ul.ie> <200511180001.16885.pogonyshev@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132330953 28439 80.91.229.2 (18 Nov 2005 16:22:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kevin Rodgers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 18 17:22:28 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ed8z8-0004n6-IG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:21:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ed8z7-0006Vn-Qw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ed87W-00070n-7p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:25:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ed87S-00070M-KY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:25:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ed87P-000706-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:25:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ed87P-0008Pk-Ae for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:25:39 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2005 15:25:37 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (EHLO [195.222.81.88]) [195.222.81.88] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 18 Nov 2005 16:25:37 +0100 X-Authenticated: #16844820 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46226 Archived-At: Kevin Rodgers wrote: > Paul Pogonyshev wrote: > >Kevin Rodgers wrote: > >>Wouldn't the easiest thing be to add a call to > >>(set-hard-newline-properties (point-min) (point)) after > >>mail-header-separator and its trailing newline have been inserted? > > > > Maybe, but that defeats the intention of providing a generic solution. > > How is the set-hard-newline-properties function any less generic than > the hard-newline variable? (Remember, the variable proposed by Kim is > not a boolean that controls the behavior of the insert function; it is a > string that has to be explicitly passed to the insert function.) Uh, sorry, I don't know how I was reading your message, but I managed to seriously misread it. Yes, `set-hard-newline-properties' looks fine as well, especially if it is documented. But I think we should add that `hard-newline' constant too. Sometimes you need to pass strings to various functions and don't have a (clean) way to work directly with the buffer. In such cases the constant is useful. Paul