From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 3 dots vanish at end of filled line Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:54:20 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <200510091954.j99JsK620198@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200510072121.j97LLI217457@f7.net> <200510090057.j990v2j18877@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87slvb5j5k.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128887814 23692 80.91.229.2 (9 Oct 2005 19:56:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 19:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, karl@freefriends.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 09 21:56:42 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EOhGQ-00035R-Kh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:55:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EOhGP-0004MK-SC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EOhGF-0004M7-2P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EOhGD-0004Lt-Ja for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EOhGD-0004Lq-GR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:55:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EOhGD-0003fe-5e; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:55:05 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j99Jt4C5005371; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:55:04 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j99JsK620198; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:54:20 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: juri@jurta.org In-reply-to: <87slvb5j5k.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 09 Oct 2005 09:11:19 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43752 Archived-At: Juri Linkov wrote (talking about my proposal to display subtitles _inside the body of nodes_ the same way that the standalone Info reader does): I don't think that users who accustomed for many years in the released Emacs versions to see such titles post-processed in the Emacs Info reader will agree with this change. Countless much more radical and more widespread changes to the appearance of Info nodes have been made from 21.3 to the present Emacs CVS. Most of these changes did not fix any bugs. What makes you think that users would be so terribly upset with my change and not with all these other much more radical and more widespread departures of what they have been used to for years? The titles that would "loose their highlighting" would still be clearly (I personally even believe _more_ clearly, but that is a matter of taste) recognizable as titles, because the underlining would no longer be hidden. Sincerely, Luc.