unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: "What's This?" in Describe submenu
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:02:25 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508232202.j7NM2Pv18069@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ud5o4wiou.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:34:57 +0300)

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

   Perhaps you should re-read the example I gave.  Here's the most
   important part of that text again:

     Click this to delete all cookies from your machine.

If the only useful thing that button does is delete all cookies from
your machine, then your example does not contradict what either Stefan
or I said.  My claim is that the user expects an overview of what the
area he clicked on is used for and how he has to use it.  If the only
meaningful thing he can do is click mouse-1 on it, _then_ it is
obviously equivalent with describe-key and then clicking mouse-1.
Otherwise, it is very different.

   > I can only try out the KDE version and that one feels definitely
   > completely different from describe-key.

   Can you give a couple of examples, please?

If after pressing "What's this?" in the KDE icon editor you single
click mouse-1 on Custom Colors, it tells you what you can do there, in
particular that you have to _double_ click on a box to edit the color.
define-key would just tell you that single clicking mouse-1 sets
point.  If you click on the Draw Grid, it tells you a bunch of stuff,
including what toolbar items are often useful when you are working in
this area.  You can click on several other areas and you get similar
descriptions.  All KDE application that I have tried and that support
"What's this", behave similarly.

Sincerely,

Luc.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-23 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-21  8:21 "What's This?" in Describe submenu martin rudalics
2005-08-21 17:26 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-21 17:59   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-21 21:22     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-21 21:38       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-22  3:35         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-22  3:55           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-22  4:30           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-22 20:04             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-22 23:39               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-21 22:10       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-21 17:45 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-21 18:35 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-22  0:06 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-08-22  0:50   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-22  8:52     ` Lennart Borgman
2005-08-22  9:09     ` Lennart Borgman
2005-08-22 19:35     ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-08-22 22:16       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-22 22:59       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-22  1:59   ` David Robinow
2005-08-22  3:38     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-22  7:17     ` Jason Rumney
2005-08-22 10:43       ` David Kastrup
2005-08-22 19:35     ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-08-22 23:15       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-22  7:58   ` Kim F. Storm
2005-08-22 16:37     ` Drew Adams
2005-08-23  1:29       ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-08-22 19:53     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-22 20:15       ` Stefan Monnier
2005-08-23  3:42         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-23  0:08       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-23  3:47         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-23  4:23           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-23 14:40             ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-23 19:22             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-23 20:55               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-23  4:29           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-23  7:15             ` Jason Rumney
2005-08-23 14:37               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-23  4:40           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-23 19:36             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-23 20:56               ` Jason Rumney
2005-08-24  3:38                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-24 12:46                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-24 14:10                     ` David Robinow
2005-08-24 18:51                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-25 10:42                       ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-08-23  4:56           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-23 19:34             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-23 19:56               ` Stefan Monnier
2005-08-23 23:05                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-08-24 10:33                 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-08-23 22:02               ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2005-08-24  3:46                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-25  8:54                   ` Kim F. Storm
2005-08-25 18:05                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-23  1:29     ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-08-22 16:23   ` Drew Adams
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-23 14:08 Drew Adams
2005-08-23 14:31 ` David Kastrup
2005-08-23 19:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-23 20:53   ` Jason Rumney
2005-08-24  3:39     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-24  7:15       ` Jason Rumney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200508232202.j7NM2Pv18069@raven.dms.auburn.edu \
    --to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).