From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Task done? Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 05:00:41 -0400 Message-ID: <20050705090041.GA10450@fencepost> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120557365 6117 80.91.229.2 (5 Jul 2005 09:56:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 09:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 05 11:55:57 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dpk9K-0002Fx-RE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:55:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DpkAa-0007S7-CF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:56:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dpjvj-0003ZV-9a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:41:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dpjvh-0003Yo-Pk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:41:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dpjpz-0001UC-Ph for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:35:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DpjQX-0003wf-OA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DpjIH-0004Af-Hg; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:00:41 -0400 Original-To: Richard Stallman Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40403 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40403 On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:30:28AM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > ** Implement something better than the current Refill mode. This > probably needs some primitive support. > > Would people say that longlines does this job? > Should I delete it from TODO? It's not clear what the TODO entry means, so I don't know. longlines and refill do different things, so it seems incorrect to think of longlines as replacing refill; maybe they should be unified in some way though. -Miles -- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.