From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Masatake YAMATO Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Threads in emacs implementation Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:48:51 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20050611.124851.253392820.jet@gyve.org> References: <87vf4oaft8.fsf@zemdatav.stor.no-ip.org> <4nd5quav0o.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118462525 17384 80.91.229.2 (11 Jun 2005 04:02:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 04:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 11 06:01:54 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DgxBt-0004yr-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 06:01:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DgxGC-0000OL-SX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:06:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DgxFE-00007I-HE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:05:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DgxF6-0008Ts-TZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DgxF6-0008RK-IO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [210.130.136.40] (helo=r-maa.spacetown.ne.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dgx5Z-0000IU-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (h219-110-076-099.catv01.itscom.jp [219.110.76.99]) by r-maa.spacetown.ne.jp (8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5B3sdA21810; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:54:41 +0900 (JST) Original-To: tzz@lifelogs.com In-Reply-To: <4nd5quav0o.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 22.0.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38557 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38557 > I think an alternate solution is to have no shared variables between > threads once they are forked, and communicate through standard IPC > (pipes, semaphores, etc.). Interesting. I have never imaged this idea. How do you think linda instead of the standard IPC. http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/~matloff/Linda/NotesLinda.NM.html