From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrap fails on w32 Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 10:30:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20050525.103021.85407327.wl@gnu.org> References: <20050525.054517.90812775.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117013117 8631 80.91.229.2 (25 May 2005 09:25:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 09:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 25 11:25:13 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Das7u-0008PD-SX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 11:24:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DasBk-0007y8-LL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 05:28:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DarxM-0005pB-1H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 05:13:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DarxH-0005oL-TU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 05:13:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Darjf-0004Nn-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 04:59:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.188] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DarIl-0006iw-Vm; Wed, 25 May 2005 04:31:44 -0400 Original-Received: from p54AF98DF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.175.152.223] (helo=rigel.site) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwtQ-1DarIJ1SoG-0003le; Wed, 25 May 2005 10:31:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rigel.site (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j4P8ULAw023510; Wed, 25 May 2005 10:30:22 +0200 Original-To: jasonr@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.50 on Emacs 22.0.50.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:2dc398bc694a1e60948148ba0a42c0da X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37603 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37603 > > IMHO CRLFs are not part of the file contents in case of text files > > -- just think of transferring it via ftp in `ascii' mode. I vote > > for converting it to Unix linefeeds. Objections? > > Every version of diff I've encountered treats CRLF as different than > plain LF. This would make it difficult to check for differences with > a future version of that file/ Normally, Christian Wittern distributes files in Unix format (resp. as text), so I think this is just an error on his side. Anyway, this is really a minor thing. Werner