From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrap fails on w32 Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 05:45:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20050525.054517.90812775.wl@gnu.org> References: <01c55f4a$Blat.v2.4$da4fab00@zahav.net.il> <20050523.152611.133277796.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116996568 30637 80.91.229.2 (25 May 2005 04:49:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 04:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 25 06:49:20 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Danog-0000Ma-VL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 06:48:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DansU-00066h-2b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:52:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DanqK-0005ae-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:50:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DanqF-0005Xp-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DanqE-0005V2-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.187] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DanPa-00023K-Tg; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:22:31 -0400 Original-Received: from p54AFA7A2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.175.167.162] (helo=rigel.site) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKxQS-1DanPC3VGz-0004z1; Wed, 25 May 2005 06:22:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rigel.site (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j4P3jIAw000740; Wed, 25 May 2005 05:45:18 +0200 Original-To: handa@m17n.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.50 on Emacs 22.0.50.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:2dc398bc694a1e60948148ba0a42c0da X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37598 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37598 > > And some files have CRLF without a need -- at least I can't see a > > reason to have them: > > > MISC-DIC/cangjie-table.b5 > > MISC-DIC/cangjie-table.cns > > They are verbatim copies of the original files I got from > Christian Wittern. There's no strong reason to keep CRLFs, > but I think it's better not to modify the files. IMHO CRLFs are not part of the file contents in case of text files -- just think of transferring it via ftp in `ascii' mode. I vote for converting it to Unix linefeeds. Objections? Werner