From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mouse-face vs. transient-mark-mode Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:21:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <200504222321.j3MNL1r00833@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114212137 14948 80.91.229.2 (22 Apr 2005 23:22:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 23 01:22:15 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DP7TI-0005hx-TE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 01:22:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DP7YJ-0004KR-BT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:27:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DP7Xn-00042Z-CK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:26:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DP7Xl-00041l-Dn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:26:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DP7Xl-0002su-9V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:26:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DP7X1-0000No-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:25:55 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j3MNN3og009680; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:23:03 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j3MNL1r00833; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:21:01 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: drew.adams@oracle.com In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36279 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36279 Drew Adams wrote: Is it possible to set a priority on either mouse-face or the region highlight property to have the former yield to the latter? I can't answer your question definitively, JD, but I think the answer is "no". I am not sure whether JD's question was whether it was _possible_ to give overlays different priorities in general or whether it would be OK to do so it in the particular case referred to. In as far as the first question is concerned, `(overlay-put OVERLAY 'priority VALUE) should do it. See `(elisp)Overlay Properties'. Sincerely, Luc.