From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ChangeLog? Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:53:51 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200503040053.j240rpA22492@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <61k6osjqsz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109898035 12756 80.91.229.2 (4 Mar 2005 01:00:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 01:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 04 02:00:35 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D71B7-0000Bf-A3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 02:00:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D71UB-0006n2-Ah for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:20:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D71Sx-0006Ig-5d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:18:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D71Sg-0006DM-2R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:18:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D71Sf-0006BN-Mh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:18:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D7178-0002zS-Aw; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 19:56:22 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j240uL9N024681; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:56:21 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j240rpA22492; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:53:51 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: bob@rattlesnake.com In-reply-to: (bob@rattlesnake.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34160 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34160 Robert Chassell wrote: Which ChangeLog? Both. My hunch is that the current documentation is different than you thought and that the changed documentation says what you mean. I do not believe so. Richard said: The Emacs manual describes multiple approaches for maintaining a project. Each project, however, has its own specific policies. In other words, it is perfectly OK for other projects to just use the per-file log. That _definitely_ applies to individuals putting a single file under VC. The two logs would just duplicate each other. The Emacs manual section on VC does _not_ attempt to describe the specific policies _of the Emacs project_. Sincerely, Luc.