From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:02:41 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200503020302.j2232fR21722@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <1483.220.255.172.231.1109730379.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109733568 30937 80.91.229.2 (2 Mar 2005 03:19:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 03:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 02 04:19:28 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6KO8-0006nn-FM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 04:19:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6Kgn-00061G-Hv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:38:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D6KfX-0005vR-DZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D6KfK-0005po-2c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:36:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6KfH-0005jp-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:36:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D6KAc-0003Qm-BD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j223559N007325; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:05:05 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j2232fR21722; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:02:41 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: cyd@stupidchicken.com In-reply-to: <1483.220.255.172.231.1109730379.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com> (cyd@stupidchicken.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34036 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34036 Chong Yidong wrote: Could this patch be checked in? When require-final-newlines is t, the newline is inserted by (insert "\n"), which does not take use-hard-newlines into account, so the newline is not marked as 'hard. Are you really _sure_ that a newline inserted by saving a buffer should be hard if use-hard-newlines is enabled? I would guess that people might occasionally save their work to file while in the middle of a long paragraph, in which case the inserted newline should be soft. I guess that if people want to mark the end of a paragraph before saving, they would explicitly type RET. What situation are you thinking of that would motivate making C-x C-s insert a hard newline? Sincerely, Luc.