From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Further problem with recent changes to custom-magic-alist. Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:28:25 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200502242328.j1ONSPa18239@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200502150055.j1F0tRZ05963@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200502221541.j1MFftW21404@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <00a401c519f4$aa940870$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <200502242315.j1ONFkp18229@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109288312 10200 80.91.229.2 (24 Feb 2005 23:38:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 25 00:38:31 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D4SYs-0001d4-8K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:38:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D4SqW-0007w9-4T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:56:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D4Smo-0005rx-3C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:52:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D4SmY-0005jV-Oa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:52:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D4SmX-0005aL-0s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:52:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D4SRJ-000515-WF; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:30:38 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1ONUa9N008050; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:30:36 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j1ONSPa18239; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:28:25 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu In-reply-to: <200502242315.j1ONFkp18229@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:15:46 -0600 (CST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33781 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33781 >>From my previous reply: If deemed _really_ necessary, there would be place for things like: SAVED, but not set. Code written into `custom-file'. Or, less accurately, if custom-file is set: SAVED, but not set. Code written in your init file. That could be somewhat confusing again. Better: SAVED, but not set. Custom wrote code into `custom-file'. or: SAVED, but not set. Custom wrote code in your init file. But I really find both redundant, given the proposed text on top of the buffer. So I prefer: SAVED, but not set. which is the present version of my patch. Sincerely, Luc.