From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changed outside --> set, in Customize UI Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:15:32 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200502090215.j192FWc18790@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107917079 26897 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2005 02:44:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 02:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 09 03:44:39 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyhq4-0006R8-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:44:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyi4V-0003qC-Rb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:59:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyi1F-0002DX-Nd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:55:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyi1D-0002CI-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:55:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyhym-0000yp-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:53:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyhPa-0003GF-Sj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j192H29N026821; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:17:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j192FWc18790; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:15:32 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: drew.adams@oracle.com In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33112 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33112 >>From my previous message: Actually, I start thinking again that it _might_ be good to make _any_ option set in .emacs "untouchable" through Custom, even atoms and even in as far as the current session is concerned. This was a misformulation. I meant that the _part_ of the option set through .emacs (the elements of the hook or listvar added in .emacs) would be untouchable through Custom. But, for an atom or for hooks or list-vars _setq-ed_ in .emacs, that part is everything. Sincerely, Luc.