From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: customize-rouge output with emacs -q --no-site-file Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:54:10 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200502061954.j16JsAB15305@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <00cb01c50ad3$5f978570$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <010101c50aed$d57b4640$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <004501c50b07$6690f620$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <200502050351.j153pLL14720@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <005601c50b62$84fa3da0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <200502051451.j15EpqH06498@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107720715 28436 80.91.229.2 (6 Feb 2005 20:11:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 20:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 06 21:11:54 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cxsl1-0004v1-RV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:11:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cxsz1-0002HW-2V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 15:26:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CxsxE-0001W7-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 15:24:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cxsx6-0001Sl-IG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 15:24:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cxsx5-0001P8-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 15:24:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CxsVM-0006po-4U; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:55:36 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j16JtZ9N006713; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:55:35 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j16JsAB15305; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:54:10 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sun, 06 Feb 2005 07:42:25 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32962 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32962 Richard Stallman wrote: Perhaps we could set it up so that the "standard values" of these variables are expressions that compute the proper default based on the circumstances. Would these variables work right then? Actually user-mail-address _only_ becomes a rogue variable if you apply the patch I sent for experimentation (but did not propose to install in CVS), because it sets the standard value for this particular option too early. If you do not apply that patch you get: this option is unchanged from its standard setting. for user-mail-address, but of course, plenty of _other_ options then become rogue. What it shows is that the patch I sent is too simplistic. (Something I was actually afraid of.) Sincerely, Luc.