From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug 130397 (Was: Emacs - Ispell problem with i[no]german dictionary) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:16:33 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <200501110516.OAA03606@etlken.m17n.org> References: <20040517120658.GA6919@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <20041217121515.GA2270@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <200412221237.VAA07262@etlken.m17n.org> <20041222171306.GA4462@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <20050110130641.GB13663@tofu.mamane.lu> <20050110171611.GA10357@agmartin.aq.upm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1105422097 1242 80.91.229.6 (11 Jan 2005 05:41:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lionel@mamane.lu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, 130397@bugs.debian.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 11 06:41:29 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CoEmX-0002Ld-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:41:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CoEy4-0003uK-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:53:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CoEw2-0003G6-9P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:51:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CoEvr-0003B6-RR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:51:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CoEvr-00036z-LF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:51:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CoEP2-0001Bq-QN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:17:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j0B5GYY7015495; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:16:34 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0B5GXt25039; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:16:33 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id OAA03606; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:16:33 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Agustin Martin In-reply-to: <20050110171611.GA10357@agmartin.aq.upm.es> (message from Agustin Martin on Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:16:11 +0100) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32112 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32112 In article <20050110171611.GA10357@agmartin.aq.upm.es>, Agustin Martin writes: > (Handa, your patch worked better than I thought, read below) Thank you, that's a good news. > Also Kenichi Handa provided us with a patch to ensure that all equivalent > accented chars are mapped to the same char, if available under different > encodings, so are not considered as word boundaries if spell-checkable, > but I still got misalignment errors with it. This would however fixed > the word boundaries problem for a iso-8859-15 buffer using a iso-8859-1 > dict. > But I have just noticed that if I add coeur (with oe-1char) to > the french dict (ifrench, it contained only the oe-2char version) the > misalignment errors disappear (I only tested with coeur, do not know which > other words have the same char although I guess that most the oeu) Sorry I don't understand. What is oe-1char? U+0153 or U+0276? But, neither of them are not included in iso-8859-1/iso-8859-15? And, I have no idea why adding coeur (with oe-1char) to the dictionary solves the misalignment error. Is it because of ispell's bug? > So, patch from Kenichi Handa seems to work well for sid emacs21, much better > than I thought. However it uses code that has only been recently added to > emacs21, and things that are not available for xemacs or emacs20. Then, how about using your workaround for them, and enable my patch for an emacs that has ucs-mule-8859-to-mule-unicode? --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org