From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 22:42:34 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200412270442.iBR4gYa19826@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200412211414.iBLEEZ903426@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200412211541.iBLFfBc03861@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87llbonyup.fsf@jurta.org> <200412260206.iBQ26wG17970@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104122941 4839 80.91.229.6 (27 Dec 2004 04:49:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 04:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, yamaoka@jpl.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 27 05:48:52 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CimoO-0007ZS-00 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 05:48:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CimzA-0005lE-Rn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 00:00:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CimyK-0005Qw-DS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:59:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CimyI-0005Pu-A0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:59:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CimyI-0005PI-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:59:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cimkl-0002lc-Il; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBR4j6Fu011029; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 22:45:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id iBR4gYa19826; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 22:42:34 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:09:26 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31438 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31438 Richard Stallman wrote: Meanwhile, I am not sure it is right for this question to appear as a pop-up menu. yes-or-no-p uses a pop-up menu wen the current command was invoked with the mouse, and that is right when the command itself asks the question, but it may not be right for this. It would be easy to change undo-outer-limit-truncate to use the minibuffer unconditionally. I believe that this would indeed be a lot better. Sincerely, Luc.