From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Pogonyshev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `etags' bug? Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:45:09 +0200 Message-ID: <200412151745.09343.pogonyshev@gmx.net> References: <200412092015.16817.pogonyshev@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103125642 24963 80.91.229.6 (15 Dec 2004 15:47:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 15 16:47:13 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CebMv-0006dF-00 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:47:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CebX7-00015F-9T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:57:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CebWa-00014V-5G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:57:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CebWY-00013i-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:57:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CebWY-00013X-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:57:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CebLh-00017v-Qd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:45:58 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2004 15:39:15 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (EHLO localhost.localdomain) (195.50.12.117) by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 15 Dec 2004 16:39:15 +0100 X-Authenticated: #16844820 Original-To: Francesco Potorti` , Andreas Schwab User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31165 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31165 Francesco Potorti` wrote: > >So far for the theory. > > Ok, I added a couple comments to make this clearer. > > >=09=09=09 Unfortunately a typo during the conversion of > >LONG_OPTIONS from a preprocessing to a compile time constant has broke= n > >this. I've installed this patch to fix this: > > Wow! Thank you. My regression test suite did not cover this case... > > Paul, could you please apply Andreas' patch and, if the bug is still > there, get in touch with me? Andreas' patch fixes the problem, it now works as expected and as it did before. Thank you. Paul