From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han Boetes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:31:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20041208133138.GI14847@boetes.org> References: <20041208064957.GF14847@boetes.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1102512878 16006 80.91.229.6 (8 Dec 2004 13:34:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 08 14:34:32 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cc1uz-0006Iw-00 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:31:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc24q-0008Up-7j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:41:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc24i-0008U1-CU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:41:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc24h-0008TP-TW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:41:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc24h-0008TG-PC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:41:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.51.128.196] (helo=smtpq1.home.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cc1uZ-0008Pq-9i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:31:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.51.128.132] (port=46580 helo=smtp1.home.nl) by smtpq1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cc1uY-00039B-FO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:31:18 +0100 Original-Received: from cc15144-a.groni1.gr.home.nl ([217.120.147.78]:4574 helo=boetes.org) by smtp1.home.nl with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cc1uX-0004tQ-Ez for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:31:17 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 3710 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Dec 2004 13:31:38 -0000 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Neem contact op met support@home.nl voor meer informatie X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30859 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30859 Stefan Monnier wrote: > Han wrote: > > It would be nice if the undo history would recognize that: > > "any char" > > followed by > > m-x delete-backward-char > > > Is functionally the same as. > > > "any char" > > followed by > > m-x undo > > > I admit it's easier said than done. > > What would be the benefit? > I.e. in which cases would it make a diference? Alright, good question. I have no answer except that it was a silly idea. :-) # Han