unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, jpw@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Documentation for custom-file - is not (load	custom-file)	needed?
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 23:39:31 -0600 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412070539.iB75dV924747@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1CbWtL-0001QY-I7@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard Stallman on Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:23:59 -0500)

Richard Stallman wrote:

       If you just set `custom-file' with a setq in the user's init file, the
       :set and :get functions will not be called when the user's init file
       is loaded.  So you will have to insert calls to named functions in the
       user's init file that can be updated whenever Custom changes, without
       need to update the user's init file.

   I do not follow you here.  What calls do you mean?  Which functions
   do you mean?  What do you mean by "whenever Custom changes"?

The situation would be a much bigger mess than I thought when I wrote
the quote you are responding too.  The user _did_ customize
`custom-file' through Custom.  But we actually just wrote a setq form
into .emacs.  Should we now _consider_ `custom-file' to be customized
through Custom?  Since the user customized it through Custom, he
probably would believe that things that normally work when setting
things through Custom work for custom-file too.  But then you have to
set various properties like custom-saved and others.  (That would be
done by these named functions I referred to, which could be newly
written named functions.  If Custom started adding new properties to
the symbol-plist, which has happened in the past and may happen in the
future, these functions would need to be updated.)  But the situation
is worse than that.  If you do not set these properties, you get into
various anomalies, like the "State" message in a Custom buffer saying
that `custom-file' was changed outside Custom, which could confuse the
user.  If you do set them, you get other anomalies, because then
Custom believes that `custom-file' is defined in the custom file,
whereas it is not.  It is a mess and there is no need whatsoever to
get into that mess.

But I believe all of this is really a moot point, because I do not
believe that Custom should write anything into .emacs, unless it
actually allowed the user to specify different custom files for
different Emacs versions (because that is the main reason that the
custom file feature exists in the first place) and wrote a `cond' form
into .emacs.

Sincerely,

Luc.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-07  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-04  1:53 Documentation for custom-file - is not (load custom-file) needed? Lennart Borgman
2004-12-04 23:35 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-05 21:52   ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-06  0:24     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-06 14:10       ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-07  2:40         ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-08  4:40           ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-06  2:56     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-07  4:23       ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-05 15:50 ` John Paul Wallington
2004-12-05 17:07   ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-05 17:33     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-05 22:07       ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-06  0:46         ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-06  1:21           ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-06  4:02             ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-06 13:04               ` Stefan
2004-12-06 18:34                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-06 18:54                   ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-06 21:53                     ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-07  2:34                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-07  9:39                         ` Kim F. Storm
2004-12-07  3:27                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-07  2:56                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-08  4:40                       ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-07  3:50                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-07  4:23               ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-07  5:39                 ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2004-12-08  0:44                   ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-08  4:35                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-08 17:52                       ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-08  4:42                     ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-08 13:27                       ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-08 17:52                         ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-08 18:04                           ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-08 19:56                             ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-08 20:20                               ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-08 22:16                                 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-08  4:40                   ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-09  2:20                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-09  2:24                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-09 22:06                       ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-10  5:54                         ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-10 15:51                           ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-10 17:05                             ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-10 18:36                               ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-10 20:40                                 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-11  1:00                                   ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-11  3:38                                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-11  3:56                                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-11  4:11                                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-13  3:49                                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-13  9:01                                     ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-13 15:55                                       ` Luc Teirlinck
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-13 19:51 Richard Stallman
2004-12-14  0:34 ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-14 23:20   ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-14  1:50 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-14 23:20   ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-15  2:51     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-15 23:20       ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-16  0:48         ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-16  4:51           ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-17  0:54           ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-17  5:41             ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-17 13:20               ` Kim F. Storm
2004-12-20 10:56               ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-21  0:48                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-23  0:53                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-25 15:13                   ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-26  2:31                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-14  4:14 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-17 15:31 LENNART BORGMAN
2004-12-23 14:07 LENNART BORGMAN
2004-12-23 18:05 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-28  1:06   ` Lennart Borgman
2004-12-28  4:28     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-28 17:25       ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-23 18:34 ` Luc Teirlinck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200412070539.iB75dV924747@raven.dms.auburn.edu \
    --to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=jpw@gnu.org \
    --cc=lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).