From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: kmacro.el Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:39:57 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200412010439.iB14dvS08127@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200411300400.iAU40Vn26724@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101876203 28385 80.91.229.6 (1 Dec 2004 04:43:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 04:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 01 05:43:16 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CZMKf-0004NC-00 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:43:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CZMU7-0005K4-Bi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:52:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CZMTd-0005Gl-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:52:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CZMTb-0005G3-Pt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:52:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CZMTb-0005Fg-Ky for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:52:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CZMJ8-0007N4-4k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:41:44 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB14fPFu026611; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:41:25 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id iB14dvS08127; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:39:57 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: storm@cua.dk In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30574 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30574 Kim Storm wrote: > > In the call to `message' the extra "%s" is necessary, because the user > could have used %s or %o sequences in the macro text, that are > intended literally. Can't we just eliminate the call to format, i.e. instead of (message "%s" (format "%s%s..." ...)) use (message "%s%s..." ...) Indeed. I failed to notice this. Sincerely, Luc.