From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Can we run Lisp function in encode_terminal_code of term.c? Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:15:14 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <200411261215.VAA22895@etlken.m17n.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101471356 23328 80.91.229.6 (26 Nov 2004 12:15:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 26 13:15:48 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CXf0t-0005sQ-00 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:15:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CXfA8-0001Kl-Dz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 07:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CXfA1-0001K1-9U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 07:25:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CXfA0-0001Jo-TI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 07:25:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CXfA0-0001Jl-QO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 07:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CXf0O-0000Gw-Pa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 07:15:17 -0500 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id iAQCFETH023527 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:15:14 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAQCFEA13596 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:15:14 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id VAA22895; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:15:14 +0900 (JST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Reiner Steib on Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:56:35 +0100) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30386 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30386 In article , Reiner Steib writes: > gb2312 characters are not displayed correctly in an UTF-8 enabled > xterm when started with `emacs -nw'. This is because encode_terminal_code (that is called from write_glyphs) doesn't run pre-write-conversion of utf-8. I don't remember why I didn't do that. There's a possibility that running Lisp here is not safe. As write_glyphs is called from various places in dispnew.c, I can't tell easily whether it is safe or not. Does anybody know? --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org