From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andries Brouwer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-mode adds newlines Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:19:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20041121221942.GA16727@apps.cwi.nl> References: <20041121122629.GE20436@apps.cwi.nl> <20041121142946.GO20436@apps.cwi.nl> <1101063835.549340.23229.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <20041121211900.GA25181@apps.cwi.nl> <1101073611.808535.23395.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101075623 28417 80.91.229.6 (21 Nov 2004 22:20:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-cc-mode@gnu.org, acm@muc.de, Andries Brouwer , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 21 23:20:10 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CW042-0003ZP-00 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:20:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CW0D1-0006RX-6N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:29:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CW0Cr-0006PM-PH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:29:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CW0Cq-0006OU-Sg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:29:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CW0Cq-0006OP-Pa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:29:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.16.191.8] (helo=hera.cwi.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CW03c-0008RX-2p; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:19:44 -0500 Original-Received: from apps.cwi.nl (apps.cwi.nl [192.16.191.34]) by hera.cwi.nl with ESMTP id iALMJhxh024606 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:19:43 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from aeb@localhost) by apps.cwi.nl (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.12.2) id iALMJgb02299; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:19:42 +0100 (MET) Original-To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1101073611.808535.23395.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30212 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30212 On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 10:46:51PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Thus, so far you never stated that you actually do want a > c-require-final-newline different from require-final-newline, more > or less contradicting the part you quote here. > > There is no contradiction, _some_ people might want it. It happens > that for me they are the same. Good, thank you, that is what I thought. Andries