From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: defconst in lao.el Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:57:09 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200411170357.iAH3v9x20242@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200411141856.iAEIuEM24284@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200411170141.KAA24828@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100663922 4358 80.91.229.6 (17 Nov 2004 03:58:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 03:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 04:58:29 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CUGxg-00069k-00 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:58:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUH6T-0004Ee-1T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:07:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUH6L-0004EY-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:07:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUH6K-0004EM-Nx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:07:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUH6K-0004EJ-Kk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:07:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUGxJ-0007ET-G4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:58:05 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAH3w1Fu002483; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:58:05 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id iAH3v9x20242; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:57:09 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: handa@m17n.org In-reply-to: <200411170141.KAA24828@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi Handa on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:41:48 +0900 (JST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29955 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29955 >>From my previous message: Maybe I did send my previous patch too quickly. Does proper re-initialization of the alists also require `quail-define-package' and `quail-install-map' to be called again with the correct arguments? Then an alternate patch would work. More concretely, put any of the two that are needed for proper re-initialization inside the body of `lao-initialize-alists'. Sincerely, Luc.