From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han Boetes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current CVS doesn't bootstrap Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 19:24:55 +0059 Message-ID: <20041107182517.GB28394@boetes.org> References: <01c4c3f3$Blat.v2.2.2$7e8aa060@zahav.net.il> <01c4c41c$Blat.v2.2.2$0fa338a0@zahav.net.il> <200411062248.iA6MmEm29919@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <01c4c487$Blat.v2.2.2$d4c31400@zahav.net.il> <200411071743.iA7Hhfi01732@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1099851983 25020 80.91.229.6 (7 Nov 2004 18:26:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 18:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 07 19:26:09 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CQrjs-0007Lk-00 for ; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 19:26:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQrsC-0003Iq-1a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 13:34:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CQrr8-0002td-89 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 13:33:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CQrr7-0002tC-H2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 13:33:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQrr7-0002t4-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 13:33:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.51.128.198] (helo=smtpq3.home.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CQrik-0002xp-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 13:24:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.51.128.133] (port=50661 helo=smtp2.home.nl) by smtpq3.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CQrik-0007o5-2V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 19:24:58 +0100 Original-Received: from cc15467-a.groni1.gr.home.nl ([217.120.147.78]:43403 helo=boetes.org) by smtp2.home.nl with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CQrii-0000wn-Fz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 19:24:56 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 5309 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Nov 2004 18:25:17 -0000 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411071743.iA7Hhfi01732@raven.dms.auburn.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Neem contact op met support@home.nl voor meer informatie X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29524 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29524 Luc Teirlinck wrote: > I noticed on several sites that many people are _trying_ to do > the above procedure, but are using `make-distclean', mistakenly > believing that it will do what `make maintainer-clean' does. Would it be an idea to replace the distclean target with the maintainer-clean target? # Han