From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-c C-{l,r} in Enriched mode. Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 18:01:41 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200410032301.i93N1fe10666@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200409300305.i8U35NF21051@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200410010253.i912rVu08602@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200410032035.i93KZY810365@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096844649 25976 80.91.229.6 (3 Oct 2004 23:04:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 23:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 01:03:59 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CEFOZ-0002T1-00 for ; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 01:03:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEFV7-0000Og-Vz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CEFTp-00009k-75 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:09:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CEFTn-00008O-6t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:09:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEFTm-00007x-S3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:09:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CEFN1-0001RF-31; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:02:23 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i93N2MiU001375; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 18:02:22 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i93N1fe10666; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 18:01:41 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: dak@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:09:28 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27858 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27858 David Kastrup wrote: Hmmm. I have not enough of a clue about enriched mode to figure out whether it should combine with TeX related modes. If you enable Enriched mode in a TeX related mode, you will not be able to run TeX on the buffer nor the file. So it does not seem to make a lot of sense. Actually, you will probably not be able to run `reftex-citation' with Enriched mode enabled either, so I now believe that my worries about conflicts with reftex were unfounded. Sincerely, Luc.