From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: x-create-frame is sluggish Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:26:46 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200410010126.KAA01376@etlken.m17n.org> References: <200409250239.LAA15347@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096594059 2671 80.91.229.6 (1 Oct 2004 01:27:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karoly.Lorentey@cern.ch, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 01 03:27:27 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CDCCk-0007gl-00 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 03:27:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CDCJA-0007RQ-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CDCJ2-0007RK-DL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CDCJ1-0007R8-Vg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CDCJ1-0007R5-T4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CDCCR-0000xX-Mi; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id i911Qr7X023119; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:26:54 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i911QlU02323; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:26:53 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id KAA01376; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:26:46 +0900 (JST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:36:07 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27771 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27771 In article , Richard Stallman writes: > I think we can cache XFontSet in struct x_display_info per > each base_fontname. Then we can avoid calling of > XCreateFontSet when we create a new frame on the same > display with the same font. > Do you want to implement this? > Would it be a big or unreliable change, > that we would not want to install now? I think the change is straight forward and not that big. But, for the moment, I'm too heavily overloaded to work on it. :-( --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org