From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: C-c C-{l,r} in Enriched mode. Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:05:23 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200409300305.i8U35NF21051@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096513640 9506 80.91.229.6 (30 Sep 2004 03:07:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 30 05:07:07 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CCrHf-0004J1-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 05:07:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCrO2-000848-77 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CCrNu-00083Z-6X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:13:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CCrNt-00083B-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:13:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCrNt-00082u-8m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:13:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CCrGd-0001NA-9N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8U35siU010089 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:05:54 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i8U35NF21051; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:05:23 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27687 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27687 enriched.el contains: (define-key enriched-mode-map "\C-c\C-l" 'set-left-margin) (define-key enriched-mode-map "\C-c\C-r" 'set-right-margin) But C-c followed by a control character is reserved for _major_ modes. `(emacs)Formatted Text' states: Enriched mode is a minor mode (*note Minor Modes::). It is typically used in conjunction with Text mode (*note Text Mode::), but you can also use it with other major modes such as Outline mode and Paragraph-Indent Text mode. But when used in conjunction with Outline mode, Enriched mode overrides Outline mode's C-c C-l (`hide-leaves') binding. Should `set-{left,right}-margin' in Enriched mode be rebound? While on the subject of keybindings, it seems that there are no rules for C-c followed by a _Meta_ character. Are these just too inconvenient to worry about? Sincerely, Luc.