From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: simple patch for `etags.el'
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:22:46 -0200
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200409221822.46410.pogonyshev@gmx.net>
References: <200409201650.26315.pogonyshev@gmx.net>
	<200409221204.49928.pogonyshev@gmx.net>
	<m3oejyle3c.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095866791 31420 80.91.229.6 (22 Sep 2004 15:26:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:26:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 22 17:26:13 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CA90X-0006oB-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:26:13 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CA96W-0003vi-B3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:32:24 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CA960-0003nh-HI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:31:52 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CA95y-0003mh-HK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:31:51 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CA95y-0003mQ-DT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:31:50 -0400
Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CA8zw-0005x7-UA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:25:37 -0400
Original-Received: (qmail 29059 invoked by uid 65534); 22 Sep 2004 15:18:55 -0000
Original-Received: from unknown (EHLO localhost.localdomain) (195.50.12.114)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 22 Sep 2004 17:18:55 +0200
X-Authenticated: #16844820
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
In-Reply-To: <m3oejyle3c.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27445
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27445

Kim F. Storm wrote:

> Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmx.net> writes:
> > Actually, my patch did just this:
> >
> > =09(when (and (reached-next-percentage)
> > =09=09   (enough-time-has-passed))
>
> I was thinking about
>
>   (when (reached-next-percentage)
>     (setq next-percentage (1+ next-percentage))  ; or similar
>     (when (enougn-time-has-passed)
>       (message ...)))

Yes, this does make a difference.  This also complicates the
code quite a lot.  So, do we want time constraint as an
addition?

Paul