From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: boris@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: enriched-mode and switching major modes.
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:12:03 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200409142212.i8EMC3F21875@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvd60prqfj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:26:50 -0400)
Stefan Monnier wrote:
I lost some of the context, but enriched-old-bindings is (or should be)
permanent-local (at least as long as eriched-mode is).
`enriched-old-bindings' should definitely _not_ be permanent local.
It is supposed to restore the major mode bindings overridden by
Enriched mode. If the major mode changes, `enriched-old-bindings'
should be updated.
I wouldn't worry so much about the future: it leads to overengineering.
Also if you look at the past, you'd see that enriched-mode hasn't been
growing that much, so the risk is indeed not as clear as you seem to imply.
What I am worried about is consistency. If one sees (Foo Enriched)
in the mode line, one should not have to worry about which of
Foo mode or Enriched mode was enabled first. With my patch it does
not matter. This is the only solid and predictable solution.
It is not just the future but also user customizations of Enriched
mode. Also, if there are not going to be major future additions, then
we can quite as well quit worrying about Enriched mode altogether. It
is very much an unfinished feature. Enriched mode is supposed to grow
into a full blown word processor, supporting a variety of file
formats. It is far from that right now.
Sincerely,
Luc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-14 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-04 23:58 enriched-mode and switching major modes Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-05 17:25 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-06 0:59 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-06 16:42 ` Stefan
2004-09-06 16:53 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-10 17:40 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-11 2:14 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-11 16:56 ` Stefan
2004-09-11 21:51 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-11 22:55 ` Stefan
2004-09-12 1:46 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-12 18:18 ` Stefan
2004-09-12 2:50 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-13 7:00 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-12 9:10 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-12 16:51 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-12 17:08 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-12 18:36 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-12 20:01 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-13 7:32 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-13 23:03 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-14 3:46 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-14 12:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-14 22:12 ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2004-09-15 9:32 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-17 9:36 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-19 20:07 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-06 7:36 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-06 19:01 ` Alex Schroeder
2004-09-10 17:40 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-10 19:30 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-13 23:04 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-14 14:41 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-14 16:31 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-15 1:39 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-15 1:47 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-15 8:06 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-15 15:42 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-16 13:20 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-09-17 23:22 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-16 17:04 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-17 5:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-17 14:34 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-17 20:43 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-09-17 22:05 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-18 19:07 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-18 15:37 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-18 11:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-18 12:04 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-18 13:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-18 13:46 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-18 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-19 17:19 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-09-18 22:55 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-18 17:08 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-18 17:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-18 20:02 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-18 21:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-18 21:54 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 0:06 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-20 11:48 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-21 18:30 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-21 19:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-21 20:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-22 4:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-22 18:20 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-22 18:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-23 16:44 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-22 10:01 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-22 13:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-22 13:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-22 13:14 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-22 16:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-23 1:48 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-09-23 9:29 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-23 9:48 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-23 16:44 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-23 11:35 ` Stefan
2004-09-23 12:46 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-23 12:59 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-24 12:08 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-24 12:50 ` Stefan
2004-09-25 15:34 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-24 10:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-24 11:53 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-24 15:51 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-24 20:55 ` Alex Schroeder
2004-09-24 21:11 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-25 16:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-22 10:35 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-22 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-20 0:05 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-18 22:11 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-19 3:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-20 0:05 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-20 11:07 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 11:55 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-21 18:30 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-22 7:44 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-22 18:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-22 21:53 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-23 4:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-23 7:13 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-22 18:20 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-22 21:58 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-20 12:47 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-09-17 15:08 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-18 17:34 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-18 23:05 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-19 11:07 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-19 11:24 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-19 13:14 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-20 5:49 ` Stefan
2004-09-20 6:17 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-20 6:26 ` Stefan
2004-09-20 11:00 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 13:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-20 14:17 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 14:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-20 19:18 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-20 19:49 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-20 19:37 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 20:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-09-21 9:07 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-21 14:43 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-20 21:44 ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-09-17 23:22 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-18 16:57 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-18 17:12 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 0:05 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-20 11:35 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 11:47 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-20 13:27 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 14:23 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-20 19:35 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 19:35 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-20 20:21 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-21 9:07 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-21 11:20 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-22 7:11 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-21 18:30 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-21 20:31 ` Miles Bader
2004-09-22 3:20 ` James Clark
2004-09-23 9:30 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-21 9:53 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-09-21 11:32 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-21 18:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-21 20:34 ` Miles Bader
2004-09-22 0:31 ` David Kastrup
2004-09-22 14:00 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200409142212.i8EMC3F21875@raven.dms.auburn.edu \
--to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
--cc=boris@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).