From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rmail mbox-format branch Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 21:49:36 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200409110249.i8B2nah12319@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <41406C46.6050505@pajato.com> <01c4969e$Blat.v2.2.2$d48c9a40@zahav.net.il> <20040909221947.GB11694@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094871026 27704 80.91.224.253 (11 Sep 2004 02:50:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 02:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pmr@pajato.com, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 11 04:50:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5xxz-00061C-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 04:50:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5y3O-0006kS-Ub for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:55:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C5y3I-0006kJ-Cl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:55:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C5y3H-0006jl-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:55:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5y3H-0006jd-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:55:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C5xxo-0005zm-Cx; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:50:08 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8B2nuuE001306; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 21:49:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i8B2nah12319; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 21:49:36 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: storm@cua.dk In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26999 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26999 Kim Storm wrote: Compare these two schedules (if testing rmail adds 2 months delay): Release: When 21.4 without rmail End 2004 22.1 with rmail Mid 2005 Release: When 21.4 with rmail Mar 2005 22.1 Nov 2005 (include holiday season) That first schedule is completely unrealistic. There is no way that we will have all manuals checked, and all problems that come to light while checking the manuals fixed, before the end of the year. At the present rate, even end March is rather optimistic. Sincerely, Luc.