From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rmail mbox-format branch Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:19:47 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040909221947.GB11694@fencepost> References: <41406C46.6050505@pajato.com> <01c4969e$Blat.v2.2.2$d48c9a40@zahav.net.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094768423 6115 80.91.224.253 (9 Sep 2004 22:20:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 22:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Michael Reilly , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 10 00:20:15 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5XH5-0000ow-00 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:20:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5XMQ-0007TN-EB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 18:25:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C5XMK-0007TC-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 18:25:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C5XMJ-0007Sz-U2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 18:25:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5XMJ-0007Sw-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 18:25:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C5XGd-0001LO-Oz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 18:19:47 -0400 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C5XGd-000468-61; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 18:19:47 -0400 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c4969e$Blat.v2.2.2$d48c9a40@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26942 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26942 On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:56:16PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > OTOH, if we don't do this now, it will need to wait until a very > distant next release. Will the next release (after 21.4) be distant? I was envisioning just moving the unicode branch to the trunk about 5 minutes after 21.4 is released, and immediately going into testing for version 22. -Miles -- `To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson