From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnfolder and large-file-warning-threshold Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:26:48 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200409082326.IAA28541@etlken.m17n.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094686038 31455 80.91.224.253 (8 Sep 2004 23:27:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 23:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 09 01:27:05 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5BqC-00043u-00 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 01:27:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5BvV-0006iE-4w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:32:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C5BvO-0006i8-2W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:32:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C5BvL-0006hV-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5BvL-0006hL-0A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:32:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1C5Bq1-0008C5-0D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:26:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i88NQnqf006743; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:26:49 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by fs.m17n.org (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i88NQmU15464; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:26:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id IAA28541; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:26:48 +0900 (JST) Original-To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca In-reply-to: (message from Stefan on Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:36:57 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26905 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58416 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26905 In article , Stefan writes: >> No opinions on that? Could someone explain the reason for >> `large-file-warning-threshold'? > Emacs doesn't handle large files very well in my experience (particularly if > they're not read in as binary in fundamental mode), so I've added this > warning in case you open a very large file without intending to. Do you mean that you find a bug on decoding a very large file, or that the decoding is just very slow? --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org