From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: small Eshell docfix
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 19:45:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040907234503.GA6694@fencepost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2n001zmjf.fsf@Majnun.local>
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 04:28:36PM -0700, John Wiegley wrote:
> Which begs the question: What is wrong with the current default? All
> this discussion seems to have sprung from an unfortunate reference to
> UNIX in the docstring. How about we just fix the docstring, and leave
> the code alone?
Huh? It's different that what other unix shells use -- people are used to
`\' suppressing aliases, so it's only natural that they'll try it in eshell.
As to your point about aliases vs. eshell builtins, I have no idea. I'm not
sure whether people really care about the distinction or not (personally I
only use \ in specific well-known circumstances; given my restricted usage,
I'd probably be happy enough if \ only suppressed aliases).
-Miles
--
(\(\
(^.^)
(")")
*This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-07 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-30 3:31 small Eshell docfix Richard Stallman
2004-08-30 7:58 ` John Wiegley
2004-08-30 13:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-08-30 13:46 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-08-30 18:28 ` Richard Stallman
2004-08-30 22:03 ` John Wiegley
2004-08-31 22:06 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-01 5:45 ` Oliver Scholz
2004-09-02 4:53 ` Richard Stallman
2004-08-30 19:43 ` Emilio Lopes
2004-08-31 22:07 ` Richard Stallman
2004-08-31 23:19 ` John Wiegley
2004-09-01 19:24 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-01 20:23 ` Emilio Lopes
2004-09-01 23:14 ` Miles Bader
2004-09-02 11:19 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-02 19:47 ` Emilio Lopes
2004-09-06 6:47 ` John Wiegley
2004-09-06 18:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-07 16:29 ` Alex Schroeder
2004-09-07 18:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-07 22:41 ` Alex Schroeder
2004-09-08 3:53 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-07 23:28 ` John Wiegley
2004-09-07 23:45 ` Miles Bader [this message]
2004-09-08 5:12 ` John Wiegley
2004-09-03 17:23 ` Richard Stallman
2004-09-04 20:06 ` Emilio Lopes
2004-09-05 4:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040907234503.GA6694@fencepost \
--to=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).