From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired" Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:35:45 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200408212035.i7LKZjn06098@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <20040821.040855.00470268.jet@gyve.org> <200408210040.i7L0eCT04605@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <20040821.153827.153433523.jet@gyve.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093120677 16732 80.91.224.253 (21 Aug 2004 20:37:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 21 22:37:48 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ByccW-0004kw-00 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:37:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bycgt-0007JM-Fk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:42:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bycgm-0007JH-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:42:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bycgl-0007J5-FE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:42:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bycgl-0007J2-C5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:42:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bycax-00054g-EF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:36:11 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7LKaAuE016149; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:36:10 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id i7LKZjn06098; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:35:45 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: jet@gyve.org In-reply-to: <20040821.153827.153433523.jet@gyve.org> (message from Masatake YAMATO on Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:38:27 +0900 (JST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26378 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26378 I believe I misunderstood some remarks in `(elisp)Standard File Names'. I thought I understood from it that MS-DOS uses `_' for extensions, but after careful reading, it appears to use `_' for "invisible" files. So maybe we should allow [ \t._] before the [?*] (to allow making files invisible) and [ \t.] after the file. Unless we want to go for a more general solution. Sincerely, Luc.