Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el

[Juanma Barranquero <jmbarranquero@wke.es>]

On 06 Jul 2004 10:35:45 +0200
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:

> That's a result of the recent disruptive changes of Stefan that were
> seemingly checked in without discussion.

I don't know about "disruptive changes".  I think in this case the
problem is something trivial, like a missing `progn'.

> Could we restrict ourselves to changes that conceivably work towards
> getting into a consistent state for the release?

This is an experiment: we're now trying to see whether we can "restrict
ourselves" into working to get a release out.  Perhaps we can (and more
power to us), and perhaps we cannot, and then, other models (like
branching for a release and leaving the trunk open for people who wants
to do new stuff) would be better.  It's a matter of group dynamics, and
much, I think, depends on the size and cohesion of the group.

But in any case I see no point in getting angry about the outcome :)


                                                                Juanma