From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug tracking Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:20:49 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040614091950.7D88.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> References: <20040614004350.E184.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> <20040613235613.GB1539@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1087197725 8467 80.91.224.253 (14 Jun 2004 07:22:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 14 09:21:55 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZln1-0008Us-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:21:55 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZln0-0008Qp-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:21:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZlnt-0006ce-Bn for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZlnh-0006Ys-33 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:22:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZlne-0006Xy-TO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:22:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZlne-0006XM-O1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:22:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.181.117] (helo=idefix.laley.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BZllz-0005bM-Hn; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:20:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [172.17.221.23] (JMBARRANQUERO [172.17.221.23]) by idefix.laley.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2655.55) id LSNJ7S7R; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:19:56 +0200 Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: <20040613235613.GB1539@fencepost> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.08.01 [en] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24945 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24945 On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 19:56:13 -0400 Miles Bader wrote: > Most users are _lazy_ -- if reporting a bug entails a lot of extra work, > they'll either give up reporting the bug, or they'll just omit all the info > (if the interface allows it). Well, two points: - Report quality must be not so bad, after all, when many projects use IT. As users usually have to register with an e-mail, interested developers can always ask for more info. That happens right now, even with the context information of M-x report-emacs-bug. - Certainly, if we are able to use an IT where M-x report-emacs-bug creates a report (via de url package or whatever) that'd be great. Nobody's proposing dispensing with this interface. Juanma