From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug tracking Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:38:09 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040613163424.4E51.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> References: <20040613132610.BC11.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> <20040613132846.GA20920@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1087137515 13220 80.91.224.253 (13 Jun 2004 14:38:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 14:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 13 16:38:30 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZW7y-0006Sk-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:38:30 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZW7y-0002sF-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:38:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZW8o-000702-Gw for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:39:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZW8l-0006zc-AA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:39:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZW8k-0006zK-Oo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:39:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZW8k-0006zH-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:39:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.81.186.19] (helo=smtp09.retemail.es) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BZW7g-0000wm-Ck; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([213.37.34.195]) by smtp09.retemail.es (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP id <20040613143811.HDV29475.smtp09.retemail.es@[127.0.0.1]>; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:38:11 +0200 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040613132846.GA20920@fencepost> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.09.01 [en] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24924 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24924 On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 09:28:46 -0400, Miles Bader wrote: > Well obviously it's not a comparison against zero; people have always managed > somehow, via files in the source tree, or mailing lists, or whatever. Sure, you're right. But my bringing this whole issue is because I feel we manage, but we don't have information enough. Perhaps bugs would be better squashed if people were more conscious about how many have been reported, their severity, and their status. > These ad-hoc systems may not be all that great -- but they may very well be > better than something like what savannah offers. OK. But what Savannah offers is not the only option (I hope). /L/e/k/t/u