From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug tracking Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:34:05 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040613163124.4E4E.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> References: <863c4zy8mt.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1087137313 12810 80.91.224.253 (13 Jun 2004 14:35:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 14:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 13 16:35:04 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZW4e-0006Lm-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:35:04 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZW4e-0002nY-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:35:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZW5S-0006Zm-Vt for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:35:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZW54-0006R5-93 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:35:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZW50-0006Q8-78 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:35:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZW4z-0006Pr-TH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.81.186.19] (helo=smtp09.retemail.es) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BZW3h-0006UH-C7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([213.37.34.195]) by smtp09.retemail.es (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP id <20040613143404.GWN29475.smtp09.retemail.es@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:34:04 +0200 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <863c4zy8mt.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.09.01 [en] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24923 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24923 On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 13:55:54 +0200, Kai Grossjohann wrote: > Why not? I thought the discussion was about putting things reported > by M-x report-emacs-bug RET into a database? When I started the thread, I was talking mainly about exactly *that*; it's more difficult to manage open bugs that ideas for new developments or things to finish (etc/TODO could be used for that, even if it isn't right now). > The mailing list bug-gnu-emacs is nice, but it doesn't provide a list > of open issues, it doesn't provide a way to get a list of bugs that > are being worked on by somebody, and so on. In other words: it doesn't help in managing open issues. I fully agree. /L/e/k/t/u