From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug tracking Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 02:08:05 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040613020510.B090.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> References: <20040613000234.B07C.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> <20040612230638.GB13930@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1087085363 28790 80.91.224.253 (13 Jun 2004 00:09:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 00:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 13 02:09:18 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZIYo-00087x-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 02:09:18 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZIYn-0007rW-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 02:09:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZIZc-0001Ui-EY for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 20:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZIZY-0001TG-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 20:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZIZV-0001Rm-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 20:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZIZU-0001QX-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 20:10:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.81.186.19] (helo=smtp09.retemail.es) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BZIXc-00012F-GU; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 20:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([213.37.34.195]) by smtp09.retemail.es (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP id <20040613000803.XANE29475.smtp09.retemail.es@[127.0.0.1]>; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 02:08:03 +0200 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040612230638.GB13930@fencepost> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.09.01 [en] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24897 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24897 On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 19:06:38 -0400, Miles Bader wrote: > I doubt a fancy `issue tracker' would make a whole lot of difference -- I was not saying "fancy". In fact, I have no preference for one or another, and simple is enough. But certainly a text file is not what I was talking about. I bet it won't be useful. No, scratch that. I bet it won't be used. > I think the best thing for help to get TODO more used would be a bit more > structure / categorization in the file, to make it less daunting for > first-time viewers, and an easy way for regular developers to see changes to > it, without having to explicitly _do_ something, e.g., a special mailing list > just for commit diffs to TODO. So, we should develop a simple issue tracker, instead of using a simple, already-existing issue tracker... /L/e/k/t/u