From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Checkout of Emacs CVS through firewall Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:08:59 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040609150026.1C79.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> References: <20040609113807.1C70.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> <20040609124039.GA26005@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086786573 26554 80.91.224.253 (9 Jun 2004 13:09:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 09 15:09:24 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BY2pY-0007vX-00 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:09:24 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BY2pY-0001BX-00 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:09:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BY2qB-0003jk-Lk for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BY2q6-0003hS-Gw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:09:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BY2q4-0003h4-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:09:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BY2q4-0003gu-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:09:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.181.117] (helo=idefix.laley.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BY2pA-00009h-4P; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:09:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [172.17.221.23] (JMBARRANQUERO [172.17.221.23]) by idefix.laley.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2655.55) id LSNJ6ZZG; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:08:18 +0200 Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: <20040609124039.GA26005@fencepost> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.08.01 [en] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24768 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24768 On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 08:40:39 -0400 Miles Bader wrote: > Um; I'm not sure if there are funny issues with windows or not. tla seems to work OK, though it looks a bit... "unpolished"? > Before doing anything I'd recommend you make a `revision library' -- it OK, done. $ cd $MY_SRC_DIR $ tla get miles@gnu.org--gnu-2004/emacs--cvs-trunk--0 emacs I'm currently doing that, and it's *slow*, even on a fast connection :( > I've never done R/W access for anyone else, so it would take some time to > work out what to do, but it might be an interesting experiment -- I'd like > for it to be possible for others to commit via arch. If I ever get to speed with arch we can try to make it work. > [An alternative which is slightly more `archy' would be for you to set up > your own archive with your own branch of emacs, arrange for it to be > anonymously accessible, and then periodically ask for it to be merged into > the cvs-synchronized branch -- ideally that would via some sort of automatic > mechanism e.g. a mail daemon, but of course that requires more > infrastructure.] Yeah, I imagined the "proper" way was to do something like that (that's one of the fortes of arch, isn't it?), but is too complex for my current needs. > It's synchronized via a script that I run manually, but I run it pretty > often (every time I log into fencepost mostly) as it's just one command. More than enough. What I want to do is synchronize my local copy at work once or twice a day, at most. Currently I'm forced to get updates from home via a USB memory stick. Thanks a lot for your help, Juanma